Isn't it strange when an accident happens, people begin to apportion blame...Questioning every decision made up until that point, analysing all the details, picking over the nitty gritty...
Where as if the accident hadn't have happened no-one would have questioned any decision made, wouldn't come to any conclusion from analysing the details, and nitty gritty would be non existent...
So why is it that those details and decisions become relevant when accidents occur?
why can't the accident be looked at singularly, compartmentalised from the actions that preceded it...
An accident is an unexpected occurrence, with no intention behind it...
We call it an accident... but as soon as blame is placed, is it really an accident anymore?
No comments:
Post a Comment